TL;DR
This article will explain the key differences when comparing formal vs informal learning:
- Formal learning is structured by design: certified courses, LMS training programs, and classroom instruction — all built around clear goals with measurable outcomes.
- Informal learning follows a different logic: peer exchange, on-the-job experience, and self-directed exploration driven by immediate need rather than a predefined curriculum.
- Non-formal learning sits between the two: structured but without formal certification — workshops, coaching sessions, and professional communities of practice.
- Most effective learning programs today combine both formal paths for consistency and compliance, informal channels for context, and real retention.
Whereas formal learning happens in training-based organizations, workplaces, on mobile devices, in classrooms, and online, informal learning is based on practical, continuing education. Informal learning is a crucial concept, especially for individuals who must stay abreast of rapid technological and economic changes. While informal learning symbolizes a key to entering the world of employment, it also represents the steps in building a successful career.
“Experiential and job-embedded approaches show that you can effectively apply theory in real-world contexts. Employers value microlearning for its ability to foster continuous skill-building and adaptive learning and its personalized approach to meeting specific educational needs. Additionally, active participation in social groups, discussion forums, and collaborative projects demonstrates initiative and teamwork, which are highly sought-after traits.”
—Peter Kulko, Open edX Engineer, Raccoon Gang
What Is the Difference Between Formal and Informal Learning?
Formal learning is structured instruction that takes place in an organized environment — a training institution, a workplace program, or an online course delivered through an LMS. It has defined objectives, a set timeline, and typically leads to a certificate or measurable outcome.
Informal learning happens outside that structure. It takes place in daily work — through peer conversations, self-directed research, or simply figuring something out as you go. There is no fixed curriculum, no assessment, and often no clear moment where learning begins or ends.
Non-formal learning occupies the space between the two. It is structured enough to have a clear goal and a facilitator, but it does not lead to formal accreditation. Workshops, mentoring programs, lunch-and-learn sessions, and professional communities of practice all fall into this category.
| Aspect | Formal Learning | Informal Learning |
| Environment | Takes place in institutions like schools or universities, with controlled, optimized spaces for learning. | Can be experienced anywhere—workplaces, homes, communities—during daily activities or through self-directed exploration. |
| Structure | Highly structured, with a predefined curriculum and clear learning outcomes. It follows a consistent and organized path. | Flexible and unstructured, where learners choose the pace and direction. Learning is often spontaneous and needs-based. |
| Learner Autonomy | Learners have limited autonomy, with a structured path set by educators. | Learners have high autonomy, controlling what, when, and how they learn based on personal needs and interests. |
| Methodology | Lecture-based assignments and exams are common. Learning is often theoretical, with practical applications later. | Hands-on, experiential, focusing on real-world problem-solving with immediate application. |
| Assessment | Formal assessments such as exams, quizzes, and graded assignments are used to measure progress. | No formal assessments, progress is often self-evaluated or peer-validated through practical application. |
| Certification | Results in recognized certificates or degrees, validating skills for employers or further education. | Generally, no formal recognition, though skills gained may still be valuable in practice. |
| Duration | Time-bound, with a set period like semesters or courses. Follows a structured timeline. | Continuous and lifelong, happening throughout life without fixed timeframes. |
| Intent | Goal-oriented, aiming for specific outcomes like degrees or certifications. Learning objectives are clear from the start. | Incidental and spontaneous, driven by curiosity or problem-solving with no set objectives. |
| Delivery | Delivered by trained educators with standardized methods. Teaching is guided by professionals. | Self-directed or peer-led, often based on curiosity or immediate needs, without formal instruction. |
Choosing between the two is rarely the right question. The more useful question is how to design formal learning so it connects to, and reinforces, the informal learning that happens around it — and how to create conditions where informal learning is visible, shareable, and valuable to the organization.
Formal learning methods
Formal learning covers a range of structured, intentional approaches — each with a defined purpose, a measurable outcome, and a clear delivery format. Below are the three most common methods, along with how they show up in workplace settings.
1. Classroom-based learning
Classroom-based learning is one of the most common formal learning methods occurring within a structured educational setting. This method typically involves an instructor who delivers lessons, assigns homework, and assesses the progress of learners. Classroom-based learning often includes a mix of lectures, discussions, group activities, and individual work.
Workplace example: a compliance team runs a quarterly in-person session where employees work through regulatory updates, complete scenario exercises, and receive direct feedback from a subject-matter expert before a short assessment.
2. Online courses and LMS-Delivered Training
Online courses are another example of formal training, which involves delivering educational content through digital platforms such as learning management systems (LMS) or MOOCs (massive open online courses). Online courses offer greater flexibility and accessibility than traditional classroom-based learning and often include multimedia content, quizzes, discussion boards, and other interactive elements.
Ready to take your online education to a higher level? Explore Tanuki, our innovative SaaS LMS for online courses. With effortless hosting, multilingual support, regular platform upgrades, and free access to the powerful analytics tool, Tanuki empowers educators and organizations to create, manage, and deliver engaging online courses effortlessly. Discover the future of online education—visit the Tanuki homepage.
Workplace example: a global software company uses its LMS to roll out mandatory security awareness training across offices in multiple countries — each employee completes the same modules at their own pace, with automated progress tracking and manager reporting built in.
3. Workshops and training programs
Formal learning also encompasses workshops and training programs, which are typically shorter and more focused than traditional classroom-based courses. These training experiences often target specific skills or knowledge areas and are led by expert facilitators. Workshops and training programs can be delivered in-person or online, depending on the needs and preferences of the learners.
Workplace example: an HR department brings in an external facilitator for a two-day workshop on performance conversations — managers practice real scenarios in small groups, receive live coaching, and leave with a shared framework to apply immediately.
Informal learning methods
Most of what people actually learn on the job happens informally — through experience, observation, and knowledge-sharing that never makes it onto a training calendar. The three most common forms are below.
1. Self-directed learning
Self-directed education is an informal method of study in which individuals take the initiative to define their educational goals, develop a plan, and seek resources to achieve their goals. This method often involves reading books, watching videos, or researching online to acquire new knowledge or skills.
Workplace example: a marketing manager notices a gap in her data skills and spends two weeks working through analytics tutorials on her own time, applying each concept directly to her team’s current reporting.
2. Social learning
Social learning is an informal approach to education that relies on interaction with other people, such as colleagues, friends, or mentors. This method can involve learning through conversations, networking events, online forums, or social media platforms. Social learning capitalizes on the power of shared experiences and diverse perspectives to foster knowledge acquisition.
Workplace example: a company creates an internal channel where customer support staff share tricky cases and how they resolved them — what starts as a place to swap notes quickly becomes the team’s most-referenced resource for handling edge cases.
3. Experiential learning
Experiential education is a hands-on, informal method of training that involves teaching through real-life experience and practice. This approach can include job shadowing, internships, volunteering, or simply trying new tasks or projects at work. Experiential education emphasizes the importance of training by doing and encourages learners to reflect on their experiences to improve their skills and understanding.
Workplace example: a junior project manager is given full ownership of a small internal product launch — working through real decisions, navigating stakeholders, and debriefing with a senior colleague afterward builds skills that no formal course replicates as efficiently.
The 70:20:10 Framework: Structuring the Balance
For corporate L&D teams, the 70:20:10 model gives a practical way to connect formal, social, and workplace learning.
The model suggests that workplace learning often comes from three sources:
- 70% from job experience — project work, stretch tasks, and real problem-solving
- 20% from social learning — mentoring, coaching, peer feedback, and team knowledge exchange
- 10% from formal training — LMS courses, certifications, workshops, and classroom programs
The numbers should guide strategy, not dictate it. Each role, skill area, and organization will shift the balance. Still, the model challenges a common L&D reflex: turning every performance gap into another course.
Most learning conditions already exist inside daily work. L&D teams need to connect them.
In practice, this changes how organizations use an LMS. The platform should support formal content and the social layer: discussion forums, collaborative tasks, peer comments, and manager visibility into team activity. Open edX supports this structure, while RG Analytics helps program managers track learner engagement across formal and social touchpoints.
Raccoon Gang applied this approach when building a custom LXP for an association of international academic institutions. The platform combined structured content, peer learning features, and personalized learning paths based on learner activity. Within six months, user engagement grew by 30%.
How to Choose Between Formal and Informal Learning
As stated earlier, the choice between the formal and informal learning approach comes down to the intention, objective, challenges and how any of these learning patterns facilitates the learner in developing a successful career path and to perform at their full potential.
When evaluating either approach, three areas matter most: how content is developed, who the target audience is, and how performance will be tracked.
In addition, each of these training patterns offers different values in the lives of the learners. Again, the choice between the two comes down to the objectives and intent of the learners.
As with just about every other methodology, formal and informal learning approaches also have differences when it comes to studying basics. Let’s discuss these basic differences separately.
Organized learning environment
Formal learning is built around a structured course outline: predefined, with a deadline, best suited for learners who need to acquire a specific skill set within a set timeframe. Informal learning has no such constraints. It can occur anywhere, anytime — at work, online, or in daily life — following the logic of need rather than curriculum.
Eager and self-motivated Learners
Formal learning requires genuinely engaging content to maintain student motivation throughout. Without it, learners disengage as the course progresses. Informal learners tend to stay motivated naturally, because they are pursuing something they chose, in a context they find directly relevant.
Spontaneous Learning
Informal learning does not wait for a training calendar. A colleague demonstrating a tool, a quick conversation that answers an immediate question: these moments happen constantly and cannot be planned for. Formal learning is the opposite — deliberate, time-bound, and structured around a clear objective.
Lifelong learning process
Formal learning is episodic: it serves a specific goal within a defined timeframe. Informal learning is continuous, evolving through every stage of a career — learning from peers, from mentors, and eventually from people with less experience as fields and technologies shift.
At Raccoon Gang, we embrace the value of lifelong learning. Our Continuous Education Solution empowers institutions to foster this enriching journey, providing the tools and support needed to nurture intellectual growth throughout life. Visit our Continuous Education Solution page today.
Quantifiable Learning
Formal learning is measurable by design: exams, assessments, and completion records provide the documentation organizations need. Informal learning resists that kind of measurement. Skills gained informally are real, but demonstrating them requires performance data or peer recognition rather than a certificate, and that remains one of their practical limitations in organizational settings.
Formal vs Informal Learning: Relevance in 2026
The boundary between formal and informal learning is becoming less fixed, and AI is the primary driver of that shift.
AI is making the line between formal and informal learning harder to draw. Recommendation engines now give structure to informal learning. An LMS can suggest resources based on role, activity history, and performance gaps. The learner still chooses the next step, while L&D teams gain data they can track. Open edX supports this through API integrations with AI recommendation tools.
AI tutors blur the line from another side. A learner may ask a question during a work task, outside any course or schedule. That looks informal. Yet when the platform logs the exchange, L&D teams can spot knowledge gaps and adjust training plans. The Open edX AI Tutor, now under active community development, brings this feature into the platform.
Generative AI also changes content production. A subject-matter expert could create a microlearning module in hours instead of weeks. As a result, teams have fewer reasons to delay formal content when learners need quick support.
For L&D teams in 2026, the main task is clear: connect LMS paths, peer learning, job practice, and AI support into one measurable system. Blended learning offers the simplest route. Use structured LMS paths for onboarding, compliance, and core skills. Then keep learning active through peer communities, team knowledge bases, and work-based practice.
The Final Word
When educators prioritize learners’ interests and needs, they become more engaged and motivated to participate in learning activities. The perceived rigidity and restrictiveness of formal learning are causing many institutes and organizations to shift toward informal learning.
It is dependent on the pre-defined norms of the institutions whereas the learners’ interest and needs fade away. Conversely, an informal learning approach succeeds to convert the needs and interest of learners in a more adaptive and flexible formation.
The content developers must recognize and consider the range of training opportunities in course design. They must iron out the objectives and needs of the learners first and then design a custom eLearning solution that makes the most sense for learners. In this way, they can find the optimal approach to education that combines both formal and informal learning.
FAQ
How can I integrate formal and informal learning to improve my personal development?
Integrating formal and informal methods can be a pivotal step for personal development. Start with competency-based education through structured e-learning modules on platforms like Open edX to master key skills. Then, incorporate the following informal approaches:
- Microlearning or job-embedded learning to apply knowledge in real-world situations.
- Self-paced and experiential learning to explore topics at your own pace while engaging in practical activities.
- Participating in social activities via discussion forums or peer-to-peer groups to help solidify what you’ve gained.
This blend creates a personalized learning pathway that balances foundational knowledge with adaptable skills, boosting knowledge retention and growth.
What Is Non-Formal Learning, and How Is It Different?
What Is the 70:20:10 Learning Model?
- 70% through job experience, stretch tasks, and real projects
- 20% through coaching, peer feedback, and team knowledge exchange
- 10% through LMS courses, certifications, and formal programs
The numbers will shift by role, skill, and business context. Still, the model helps L&D teams avoid one common mistake: treating every performance gap as a course request. Much of the learning already happens in daily work and peer interaction. L&D teams need to connect those layers and make them easier to track.
Do employers value informal learning experiences when hiring?
For example, Raccoon Gang’s experience with creating custom learning platforms, like the Learning Experience Platform (LXP) for an association of international academic institutions, demonstrates how these tools can enhance personal development by blending structured learning with informal, user-driven education.
This LXP incorporated social learning features, personalized learning paths, and gamification, resulting in a 30% increase in user engagement within the first six months.
To see more examples of how Raccoon Gang has supported similar projects, you can explore other case studies.
Can formal education systems adopt informal methods to improve student engagement?
Traditional courses can integrate gamification, interactive simulations, and informal assessments to make the experience more dynamic. Social elements like discussion forums and peer-to-peer collaboration promote engagement, while self-paced options give students greater autonomy. Schools also benefit from microlearning and adaptive content to offer bite-sized, personalized experiences.
These approaches not only increase engagement but also strengthen knowledge retention. Contact Raccoon Gang custom education course specialists for individualized assistance in implementing informal learning tools into your company’s learning routines.
